<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: better results with Illustrator&#8217;s live trace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/</link>
	<description>Arena for local visual arts communication and expression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:29:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vuel Egham</title>
		<link>http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Vuel Egham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Yep, it has it&#039;s place, and certainly is the perfect solution for large scale, long distance readability, but it will never trace a bitmap logo well enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, it has it&#8217;s place, and certainly is the perfect solution for large scale, long distance readability, but it will never trace a bitmap logo well enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bchild311</title>
		<link>http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>bchild311</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>I second the Flash Trace Bitmap function. I still use it. The live trace seems to work well for complex artwork and translates to print well too. Anyone see the green monster billboard Omniture did? Live Trace ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the Flash Trace Bitmap function. I still use it. The live trace seems to work well for complex artwork and translates to print well too. Anyone see the green monster billboard Omniture did? Live Trace &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fubbs</title>
		<link>http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>fubbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>i like the trace bitmap function in flash (and it&#039;s been around for years)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the trace bitmap function in flash (and it&#8217;s been around for years)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wade</title>
		<link>http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>What other utilities do you use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What other utilities do you use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaredts</title>
		<link>http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>jaredts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Similiar to what Fubbs just said, but I&#039;ve found better results in Photoshop selecting color ranges, and cutting and pasting my paths into illustrator. I really have never had great success with live trace. Its nice for simply comping, and as a band-aid fix, but to truely get great results I have always looked elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similiar to what Fubbs just said, but I&#8217;ve found better results in Photoshop selecting color ranges, and cutting and pasting my paths into illustrator. I really have never had great success with live trace. Its nice for simply comping, and as a band-aid fix, but to truely get great results I have always looked elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fubbs</title>
		<link>http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>fubbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ugaf.org/2007/04/15/better-results-with-illustrators-live-trace/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I start with dropping the image to greyscale, then bumping up the contrast &amp; brightness to just below blowout. Finally, I sharpen it up with unsharp mask to get the most defined edges possible.

Once in Illustrator, I usually start playing around with the different trace presets, then dial it in once I&#039;m close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I start with dropping the image to greyscale, then bumping up the contrast &amp; brightness to just below blowout. Finally, I sharpen it up with unsharp mask to get the most defined edges possible.</p>
<p>Once in Illustrator, I usually start playing around with the different trace presets, then dial it in once I&#8217;m close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
